FAQ: 2020 Farm Requirements

By providing a framework for sustainable agriculture, the Farm Requirements can help farmers produce better crops, adapt and mitigate climate change impacts, increase their productivity, and reduce costs. The standard is designed to support certificate holders to maximize the positive social, environmental, and economic impact of agriculture, while offering farmers an enhanced framework to improve their livelihoods and protecting the landscapes where they live and work.

The 2020 Sustainable Agriculture Standard continues to differentiate between smallholders and large producers. Small farms are small-scale agricultural producers that primarily rely on family or household labor, or workforce exchange with other members of the community. They might hire temporary workers for seasonal tasks or even hire (few) permanent workers when the farmer or his/her family cannot do the work by themselves. Small farms can’t afford to be certified individually and usually need to rely on the Group Management for record development and record keeping. Large producers are defined as producers that use hired labor, and therefore do not rely primarily on family labor.

The foundation of the standard are the core requirements, which address fundamental areas of sustainable agriculture. These always have to be met in order to achieve certification. The core requirements prescribe good practices with respect to key sustainability topics and are formulated as pass/fail requirements, sometimes containing a set threshold. Core requirements make up the majority of those contained in the standard.

Find out the latest information about the Rainforest Alliance’s work on herbs and spices here.

Vegetables are currently covered by the 2020 Program.

In the new standard, geolocation data (points and polygons) is added as a new request for each farm unit of each farmer. Starting with geolocation points for smallholders, in the improvement topics polygons (data of the outlines of all actual farm units included in the certificate) will be required over time. It is acknowledged that collecting full polygon data can be a laborious and costly task, therefore the collection can be spread over time.  On the one hand producers can use geolocation in dashboard tooling for more efficient group management, compliance maps and risk maps. Polygons give much more accurate risk maps and facilitate yield estimation. On the other hands, polygons can be valuable to facilitate land title recognition and other types of benefits like subsidies. For the Rainforest Alliance the data will help assess risks (for example of deforestation or water scarcity) and support in identifying duplicates in certificates as well as support certification bodies in the preparation of the audit.

By requesting certificate holders to comply with the improvement requirements of progressive digitalization of internal inspection, the Rainforest Alliance aims to promote certificate holders to use data in a management (PDCA) cycle to be able to make better informed decisions. Data should increasingly be digital so the certificate holder can more easily analyze it to identify issues and priorities in a management plan. Improvement requirements state that digital data are to be used by the group management for improvement plans at farm level and not only at group level. Beyond assessing compliance, the Group Management will have a role in providing services to individual group members with the support and the use of digital data.

For farmers, yield estimation is a key tool to have better insight into the many aspects of their farming business including productivity, (labor) costs and expected sales and income, and to be able to benchmark their productivity.

The costs of the new program for farms and farm groups are related to the implementation of the new standard, such as training, human resources, input and equipment and the audit costs. This means that the cost of the new certification depends on these factors. With the Sustainability Differential and the Sustainability Investments the buyers will contribute to the costs for the investments in sustainability improvements and the hidden operational costs of achieving certification at producer level.

The 2020 Certification Program seeks to improve rural livelihoods by helping farmers boost their productivity and by introducing new mechanisms to reduce the systemic imbalances in global supply chains.

Find out more about the Rainforest Alliance’s approach to shared responsibility in this overview.

The new standard also takes a stronger and more consistent approach to addressing gender in-equality, requiring the collection of disaggregated data to identify gaps. The requirements oblige certified farms and supply chain actors to appoint a liaison representative or committee to support gender equality and prevent, monitor, and remediate gender discrimination or harassment. As with the previous Rainforest Alliance and UTZ standards, the new standard continues to include protections for vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women, workers who handle pesticides, workers who live in employer-provided housing, and migrant workers recruited through third-party labor providers.

Assess-and-address is a new, risk-based approach that focuses on prevention, commitment, improvement, and incentivizing farm owners to address these issues. It also aligns with the growing international consensus around good practices in human rights due diligence as laid out by the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Find out more in our overview of the assess-and-address approach.

The Rainforest Alliance standard defines child labor as work that deprives children of their dignity, their potential, and their childhood. This includes: 

• Work conducted by children under 15 years for the farm, group or group members. In case national law has set the minimum work age at 14 years (or an age higher than 15), this age applies. 
• Work conducted by children under 18 years, for the farm, group, or group members that may harm their physical, mental, or moral wellbeing, because of the nature of the work and/or the number of working hours. 

This includes but is not limited to carrying heavy loads, or work in dangerous locations, in unhealthy situations, at night, or with hazardous substances or equipment, as well as trafficked, bonded or forced labor. 

There are some types of work children are allowed to be engaged in, known as child work. 

Child work: 

Children’s or adolescents’ participation in work that does not affect their health and personal development or does not interfere with their schooling, is generally regarded as being something positive. This includes activities such as helping their parents around the home, assisting in a family business or earning pocket money outside school hours and during school holidays. These kinds of activities contribute to children’s development and to the welfare of their families; they provide them with skills and experience and help to prepare them to be productive members of society during their adult life. 

This includes: 

Regular employment/work: From the age of 15 (in developing economies 14) can start general employment or work not exceeding 48 hours per week. In countries where the minimum age is higher or the number of permitted hours of work is lower, the national set minimum age and maximum hours apply. Children’s work should be non-hazardous, safe and age-appropriate and not interfere with compulsory education. 

1. Light work: Children in the age of 13-14 years may perform light work, provided that the work not be harmful to their health and development, does not interfere with their schooling or training, is under the supervision of an adult, and does not exceed 14 hours a week. In case national law has set the light work ages at 12-13 years, these ages apply. 

2. Family labor: Farming activities done by children living on small-scale family farms that consist of light, age-appropriate duties that give them an opportunity to develop skills, does not classify as child labor provided that the activities are not harmful to their health and development, do not interfere with schooling and leisure time, and are under the supervision of an adult. 

The 2020 Sustainable Agriculture Standard introduces an assess-and-address approach to tackling child labor. More information about how this works can be found in the Assess and Address Position Paper.

The Rainforest Alliance defines discrimination as per ILO Convention 111: “Discrimination implies any distinction, exclusion or preference made on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin, which has the effect of nullifying or impairing equality of opportunity or treatment in employment or occupation”. Gender based discrimination refers to any distinction, exclusion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enjoyment or exercise by women, irrespective of their marital status, on the basis of equality of men and women, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural, civil or any other field. In the context of the certification program, vulnerable groups include especially women, indigenous people, migrants, temporary workers and youth. In the current Rainforest Alliance and UTZ standards there is a specific criterion on discrimination, which expresses a no- tolerance approach. The 2020 Sustainable Agriculture Standard introduces an assess-and-address approach to tackling discrimination. More information about how this works can be found in the Assess and Address Position Paper.

Rainforest Alliance considers human rights, specifically labor rights, to be an integral part of sustainable farming. An essential part of labor rights is the right on a safe working environment.  

In the former UTZ and Rainforest Alliance standards, this was expressed as a prohibition of any physical, psychological or sexual harassment or intimidation at the workplace.  

The new standard addresses all forms of workplace harassment and violence of which sexual harassment forms part. There is no common agreement on the definitions of harassment, abuse and violence, and following the example of the ILO, it has been decided to use the terminology “workplace harassment and violence” as “The continuum of behaviors that result in physical, psychological and sexual harm of workers”, whereas with harassment is understood: 

“Incidents where staff are abused, threatened or assaulted in circumstances related to their work, including commuting to and from work, involving an explicit or implicit challenge to their safety, well-being or health. 

Workplace violence includes both physical and non-physical violence. It finds its expression in physical assault, homicide, verbal abuse, bullying/mobbing, sexual/racial harassment and making threats.” Source: WHO. 

Sexual harassment is defined as: behavior that is sex-based that is unwelcome and offensive to its recipient. For sexual harassment to exist these two conditions must be present. Sexual harassment may take two forms: 

1.‘Quid Pro Quo’ when a job benefit – such as a pay rise, a promotion, or even continued employment – is made conditional on the victim acceding to demands to engage in some form of sexual behavior; or; 

2. A hostile working environment in which the conduct creates conditions that are intimidating or humiliating for the victim. 

1. 1. Physical: violence, touching, unnecessary proximity 
   2. Verbal: Comments and questions about the appearance, lifestyle, sexual orientation, offensive phone calls 
   3. Non-Verbal: Whistling, sexually-suggestive gestures, display of sexual materials (Source: ILO)

The 2020 Sustainable Agriculture Standard introduces an assess-and-address approach to tackling workplace harassment and violence. More information about how this works can be found in the Assess and Address Position Paper. 

*Definition, according to terminology of Report V (1) Ending violence and harassment against women and men in the world of work International Labour Conference 107th Session, 2018, page 5, also in line with conclusions of the Meeting of Experts as mentioned in ILO, 2016a, Appendix I.

The Rainforest Alliance standard defines forced labor as all work or service which is exacted from any person under the menace of any penalty and for which the said person has not offered herself or himself voluntarily. A person is classified as being in forced labor if they are engaged in work that is involuntary (without the free and informed consent of the worker) and is exacted through threats, penalties, or some form of coercion. (See the Definitions section of the standard for examples of involuntariness and coercion as they relate to forced labor.)  

If a worker has paid a recruitment fee, this is an indicator that he/she may be in forced labor. 

The 2020 Sustainable Agriculture Standard introduces an Assess and Address approach to tackling forced labor. More information about how this works can be found in the Assess and Address Position Paper.

Yes. There is no place in Rainforest Alliance Certified farms for human rights abuses. We require our certificate holders to commit to compliance with all applicable laws and to respect internationally recognized human rights standards. We recognize the high risk of certain labor abuses within agricultural supply chains, and therefore we require producers and producer groups to commit to continuous improvement, put a rigorous risk assessment and mitigation system in place, and take immediate action on any cases of discrimination, forced labor, child labor and workplace harassment and violence. These requirements align with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), relevant ILO conventions, and other multi-stakeholder concepts such as living wage, developed in coordination with the Global Living Wage Coalition.

If a case is found during an audit, the auditor will carry out a “severity test” that examines the level of impact of the issue on the worker, how widespread it is on the farm, and whether farm management deliberately perpetrated the violation. If a severe case is found and is not remediated, or if a violation of applicable law is found, this will lead to a negative certification decision, suspension or cancellation of the certificate. If not severe, farms will be given an opportunity to take corrective action following the process laid out in the Rainforest Alliance Remediation Protocol. In addition, the farm must have effectively implemented the “assess-and-address” system to identify the risks of violations, mitigate these risks, and put in place a plan to remediate any cases identified. The implementation of the “assess-and-address” system is part of the core requirements of the Standard, and certification is granted only if core requirements are met.

The decision to suspend or decertify depends on the specifics of the case, such as severity, scale, and persistence. Situations will be evaluated on criteria such as whether it will cause lasting impact on the physical and/or psychological wellbeing/integrity of the worker; whether it is taking place on a large scale or continuously on the farm, and whether the farm/group management has deliberately committed or continued the practice.

Known cases of discrimination, child labor, forced labor, and workplace harassment and violence are required to be remediated and documented in accordance with the Rainforest Alliance Remediation Protocol and included in the Management Plan

Find a summary of the innovations in the program in the “Introduction to the Sustainable Agriculture Standard“.

In the standard the Rainforest Alliance has tried to find the best balance in regulating overtime, while working in sectors with peak seasons. The maximum overtime of 12 hours in the 2017 Rainforest Alliance standard creates challenges for certain agricultural sectors during peak season. Some sectors have several peaks of harvest during which trained labor is required with a shortage of workers. While in some sectors notable efforts are made to mechanize processes, other sectors like flowers still strongly depend on human labor. In certain cases, workers might be very willing to work overtime since this can significantly improve their income and when the hours are paid according to the law. The Rainforest Alliance investigated existing practices in other standards and the relevant ILO conventions. The ILO Reduction of Hours of Work Recommendation, 1962 (No 116) sets out an overall objective of progressive reduction of hours of work to the standard of 48 hours per week without reducing wages. The establishment of specific limits to the total number of additional hours or overtime is left to the competent authorities by all ILO Conventions. However, overtime limits still have to be reasonable, and the public authority should make a thorough evaluation of the intensity of the respective work and the risks to cause physical or mental fatigue. Some countries allow more than 12 hours of overtime provided that some conditions are met (for example, that the overtime is only temporary, and certain precautions are taken to guarantee safety and health of workers.  The Rainforest Alliance recognizes that the overtime regulation in agriculture might be necessary to accommodate peak seasons. There is no international convention on this, especially not in agriculture. The standard limits overtime in general, but leaves room for exceptional circumstances during which, within specific boundaries, more overtime is allowed.

Forests and other natural ecosystems are critical to the survival of every living thing on earth. Forests clean the air, absorb greenhouse gas emissions, and stabilize the climate—both globally and locally. Forests also provide habitat for 80 percent of the world’s terrestrial biodiversity and livelihoods for 1.6 billion people.  Find out more about how the Rainforest Alliance’s 2020 Certification Program addresses deforestation in this overview.

Find out more about the 2020 Sustainable Agriculture Standard’s approach to HCV, in this overview.

Please refer to this document.

With respect to ‘predominant languages’, requirement 1.2.7 states that management informs workers and group members in predominant languages. We received the question, if this information would always have to be available in written form. This is not required, as long as the workers and group members can understand the information. This means the information may also be conveyed verbally in these languages, if this is appropriate for the purpose and for the audience.

In requirements 4.5.1 and 5.6.1 the term ‘competent professional’ is used, respectively with regard to developing the IPM strategy and to conducting and analyzing health and safety risks. We received the question if such competent professional should always be hired externally. This is not required. There may also be competent professionals available in the group or farm management itself.

Requirement 4.4.1 on soil analysis is not meant to be costly in terms implementation. As stated in Guidance J: Soil Fertility and Conservation (p9-11), methods employed by producers should be Available, Affordable and Accessible based on their own context. Therefore, producers are not required to conduct high-tech analysis requiring expensive instruments or costly lab-tests. Guidance J mentions affordable techniques for the producers to carry out the testing.

The European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) entered into force on 29 June 2023, and implementation will begin on 30 December 2024. Under the Regulation, operators and traders who sell products into EU markets, or export from the EU, must be able to prove that these products do not originate from land deforested after 31 December 2020. 

This is valid for a range of commodities including soy, beef, palm oil, wood, cocoa, coffee, rubber and some of their derived products, such as leather, chocolate, tires, or furniture.

Rainforest Alliance certificate holders that sell their products into the EU must comply with the EUDR on time. Some of the EU rules are stricter than the current Rainforest Alliance Standard. The rules include the following: 

• For each batch or shipment, geolocation points must be provided for the plots of lands where the products originate from. For plots of over 4 hectares, polygons must be provided. 
• Geolocation data has to be provided up to 6 decimals; the Rainforest Alliance requires 4 decimals. 
• No deforestation after 31 December 2020 – this means the minor conversion as allowed by Rainforest Alliance would not be allowed in the EUDR after that date. 
• Information has to be kept for 5 years. The Rainforest Alliance requires 4 years. 

The Rainforest Alliance is currently working out how we can offer a service for certificate holders selling into the EU to include the above requirements in the Standard and audits and offer certificate holders a check and proof of EU compliance. Read more about how the Rainforest Alliance can support deforestation-free supply chains.